Skip to main content
Home

Main Menu

  • About
  • Contests
    • Changing Unsustainable Trade
    • Water Pollution and Behavior Change
    • Climate Change Needs Behavior Change
    • Farming for Biodiversity
    • Reducing Our Risk
    • Adapting to a Changing Environment
    • Turning the Tide for Coastal Fisheries
  • Solutions
  • Impact
    • Growing indigenous seeds with pride
    • Honey shows the way in Ethiopia
    • Revitalizing oceans and communities
    • Solar Sister Entrepreneurs
  • Log in
  • English
  • Chinese, Simplified
  • Français
  • Español
  • Indonesian
  • Portuguese, Brazil
Adapting to a Changing Environment

Water, Agroforestry, Nutrition and Development Foundation

Cagayan de Oro, Philippines

An Overview Of Our Solution

Who is this solution impacting?
Ecosystem
Oceans
Oceans/Coasts
Community Type
Rural
Rural
Additional Information
  • Population Impacted:
  • Continent:
General Info

Address

Lubluban, Libertad, Misamis Oriental
Cagayan de Oro
Philippines

Email

wandfdn@gmail.com
Problem

Population impacted

36,000; 75% are farmers/fisherfolks.

Size

80

Major Occupations

farming and fishing

Local resources the community depends on, and for what purpose

Upland and coastal resources

Local threats to resources

Coastal areas massive siltation and in upland areas massive loss of soil due to erosion and lack of trees and forest cover.

Climate Hazards

Uncertain climating pattern and difficulty to plant in the uplands

Level of sensitivity

Very high.

Level of adaptive capacity

Very high. Communities have difficulty making a living as source of livelihood is reduced.
Solution

We use participatory rapid appraisal in order to come-up with solutions to climate vulnerability. We did this by forming a team comprising members of the community and our group. We gathered social, economic and biophysical data with focus on the hazards and ways to solve it. Partners involved in the rapid appraisal include local government units, local associations, ourselves, academe and government line agencies, eg. Department of Environment and Natural Resources.

Results

Ecological Costs

This is via the local community clusters that we organize. Through them, community education on climate vulnerability, search for alternative livelihoods and understanding of climate change issues and coping mechanisms is achieved.

Ecological Benefit

There is no ecological cost of our strategy.

Economic Indicators used to measure benefit

Improvement in soil fertility and ability of the soil to withstand massive erosion due to tree growing is one of the ecological benefit. Trees also attracts rain and this will help stabilize climate conditions.

Community/Social Cost

Area of land planted in a diversified manner.

Community/Social Benefit

There is no community social cost.

Community/Social Indicators used to measure benefit

Communities are increasingly aware of the need to diversify farming in order to improve soil integrity and widen economic sources.

Economic Cost

Improvement in incomes. Functional community clusters doing planning and implementing their plans.

Economic Benefit

Cost is estimated at USD 5,000 per year.

Ecological Indicators used to measure benefit

Increased income, availability of food especially nutrients from home-grown vegetables year round.

What were/are the challenges your community faced in implementing this solution?

Reports of community clusters and random survey of families participating in the program.

Action

Describe the community-based process used to develop the solution including tools and processes used

Not very able. Adaptive capacity is low.

Climate hazard of concern

Our solution focused on alternative livelihoods and climate resilient farm systems in order to cope with vulnerabilities. For this we are providing "climate adaptation sustainable packs" comprising climate-resilient farm inputs. These are for example plan

How does your solution reduce the exposure of and buffer/protect the ecosystem affected?

Changing temperatures and weather patterns

How has your solution increased the capacity of the ecosystem to adapt to potential climate changes?

Improvement in small-scale farm systems would mean prevention of massive loss of top soil from the uplands due to soil erosion.

How does your solution reduce the exposure of and buffer/protect the communities affected?

Adding plants in the landscape would mean reducing soil erosion as roots of plants would prevent soil from eroding. The planting of root crops and tubers and using this as staple food would mean more secure in sources of food despite changes in climate conditions, eg. long dry spell or supertyphoons.

How does your solution reduce the sensitivity of the communities affected?

Agriculture sytems would be more adaptive compared to the present mono-crop system practiced by farmers. The growing of vegetables in the backyard means less pressure on the sea resources by coastal dwellers.

How has your solution increased the capacity of local communities to adapt to potential climate changes?

The root-crop based food security option and diversification of farming by the planting of shade tolerant high-valued fruit and commercial crops would mean reduced sensitivity to climate change. The provision of micro-credit on a revolving scheme would mean less dependence on usurers and freeing marginal coastal and upland dwellers to usurious situation.

Scale

Can this solution be replicated elsewhere?

One challenge is land ownership and the practice of mortgaging their lands to usurers in times of family crisis. We are at present implementing a land redemption and land co-management program in order to counteract this situation.

Overview
Solution
Scale
Rare
© 2025 Rare.
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
back to top